BFR Risk Screen.
Pre-treatment risk screening for blood flow restriction. Built on the APTA VTE CPG (2022), Padua, Caprini, and Wells instruments. Every recommendation shows its work. Intended for use by licensed clinicians within their scope of practice.
Zero data leaves this page. Nothing is stored or transmitted. No patient identifiers are collected — add identifiers in your own EMR.
Disclaimer · read before use
This tool is a preliminary decision-support aid. It synthesizes published instruments — the APTA Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Practice Guideline (2022), the Padua Prediction Score, the Caprini Risk Assessment Model, the Wells DVT criteria, and published BFR contraindication frameworks (Kacin 2015; AIS 2021). It is NOT a validated BFR-specific instrument, it does not diagnose or rule out DVT, and it does not replace clinical judgment or physician clearance. Blood flow restriction carries risks that are incompletely characterized in medically complex and post-surgical patients. Intended for use by licensed clinicians within their scope of practice.
Citations
APTA VTE CPG 2022: Hillegass E, Lukaszewicz K, Puthoff M. Phys Ther. 2022;102(8):pzac057. PMID 35567347.
Padua: Barbar S et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(11):2450-2457.
Caprini 2005: Caprini JA. Dis Mon. 2005;51(2-3):70-78. PMID 15900257. Validation: Bahl V et al. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):344-350.
Wells DVT (two-level): Wells PS et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1227-1235.
BFR contraindications: Kacin A et al. Annales Kinesiologiae. 2015;6(1):3-26; Australian Institute of Sport BFR Guidelines 2021.
POCUS for DVT: 2-point/3-point compression meta-analyses (Am J Emerg Med 2019; 2024 review); pitfalls (West J Emerg Med).
BFR VTE risk context: Bond CW et al. JOSPT. 2019;49(1):17-27; Nascimento DdC et al. Front Physiol. 2022;13:808622.
Download this tool for offline use
Changelog
Evidence reviewed 2026-08-17. Get notified when the evidence version updates
SIDELINE · THE METHOD ·